Bundy Law Firm

Due to precautions related to COVID-19, we expanded our options for remote consultations. Please contact our office
to discuss whether a full phone consultation or video conference is appropriate for your situation.

New Court Decisions - Duty to Protect & Enhance Brand?

On June 21, 2012, the Superior Court for the District of Montreal, Quebec, Canada entered a judgment for $16.4 Million against the Canadian Dunkin Donuts franchisor in favor of 21 former franchisees.  The court held, among other things in a new court decision, that the franchisor breached an express or implied contractual obligation to protect and enhance its brand. 

The Court stated:  "A successful brand is crucial to the maintenance of healthy franchises.  However, when the brand falls out of bed, collapses, so too do those who rely upon it. * * * [The franchisor] had assigned to itself the principal obligation of protecting and enhancing its brand.  It failed to do so, thereby breaching the most important obligation it had assumed in its contracts."

Obviously every situation is specific to its facts and to the expressed and implied terms in the contract.  However, the Dunkin case helps to frame the question of whether every franchisor has a duty to "protect and enhance" its brand.  If, as in the Dunkin case, there are facts supporting such a failure, the question of appropriate remedies arises.  The Canadian court gave its answer--a $16.4 Million judgment for damages caused by Dunkin's breach of its obligations. 

Assuming the Superior Court's decision survives expected appeals, it could become a source of reasoning and persuasive precedent for courts in the United States facing the same or similar facts and circumstances.  Query whether a franchisor that keeps a convicted felon who remains on probation as a director and officer, but somehow neglects to disclose that fact to prospective franchisees is "protecting and enhancing" its brand.  Query whether a franchisor having over 20% of franchises sold-but-not-open, with delays reaching several years in many cases and resultant litigation is "protecting and enhancing" its brand.  As with other new court decisions, Franchisees in those situations might be well advised to consult with their franchise attorneys about whether and to what extent the reasoning of the Canadian decision in the Dunkin case might apply in their jurisdiction. 

1 Comment

Leave a comment
Comment Information
blog latest

Set Your Business Up For Success

If you are considering starting a business, buying a franchise or franchising your business, contact the Bundy Law Firm for a free initial consultation. Call 888-325-8817 or complete our online form today.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Bundy Law Firm
5400 Carillon Point
Kirkland, WA 98033

Toll Free: 888-325-8817
Phone: 425-296-3411
Fax: 425-307-6224
Map & Directions